This passage is too narrow!!!
Diabetes and resistance conflict
DIABETES
Over the past forty years, the presence of diabetes in the world population has increased considerably. According to mypersonaltrainer.com, in 1980, there were approximately 180 million people suffering from the disease, while in 2014, the number increased to around 420 million. Considering that the world population in numerical terms has increased, there is no proportion between the two figures (about 4.4 billion people in 1980 versus about 7.3 in 2014). The number of diabetics has quadrupled and in this article we will try to find out why this form of metabolic disease has taken hold so rapidly in recent decades. First, let's find out what it is.
Diabetes - or diabetes mellitus - is defined by conventional medicine as a chronic disease that causes a rise in blood sugar. There are two types of diabetes, type 1 and type 2, and on the issalute.it website they are explained as follows:
The pancreas cells that produce insulin are destroyed by the body's defence system (immune system). Insulin, a hormone that regulates blood glucose levels, is therefore no longer produced because the pancreas is irreversibly damaged
Insulin is unable to maintain normal blood glucose levels because it is insufficient or because the body's cells do not respond normally to it
The diagnosis of diabetes mellitus occurs when blood glucose values are found to be higher than the conventionally established parameter, which is currently around 120/130 mg/dL (milligrams per decilitre). From an etymological point of view, the term 'diabetes' derives from the Greek 'diabĆ ino', meaning 'to pass through', 'to cross'. It has been universally accepted as a term in the medical sphere as it alludes to the frequent urination typical of diabetes sufferers, and thus we find ourselves within an etymological context that ties in well with the dimension of water or liquids in general. The term 'mellitus', on the other hand, derives from the Latin 'mellitus', meaning 'containing honey'. The meaning, in this case, is clearly linked to the concept of sugar, the latter being the organic compound 'protagonist' of the pathology examined in this article.
From the point of view of the five biological laws, there is no real differentiation with regard to the type of diabetes, as the origin of the disease occurs as always on the three levels psyche - brain - organ, and therefore we can apprehend a specific biological conflict, with an associated programme and sense. However, an interpretation regarding the biological sense of each of the two diabetics has been presented, but I will discuss this at the end of the article.
Insulin is a polypeptide hormone with anabolic properties produced by Langerhans Beta cells, located in the blood. The name is derived from 'insula' due to the fact that these cells are also called 'islets of Langerhans'. Its task is to regulate blood glucose levels through a series of metabolic operations. In purely metaphorical terms, we can also see it as a kind of funnel through which glucose in the blood is filtered to be utilised by the various tissues of the body.
The pancreatic islets or islets of Langerhans are scattered throughout the pancreas, but are most abundant in the tail. They are made up of ectodermal cells that produce hormones (endocrine function). Insulin and glucagon are normally kept in balance. Insulin lowers glucose and glucagon raises it. When the balance between the two is maintained, glucose has a stable level with discrete variations.
I DON'T WANT TO GO THIS WAY
The area of the brain that regulates the function of the beta islets of Langerhans is located in the right cerebral hemisphere, which means that people with this condition tend to be right-handed men or left-handed women (however, it is not certain that left-handed men and right-handed women 'basking' in the opposite hemisphere cannot also suffer from diabetes). Diabetes occurs when insulin production is inhibited due to a focus in this area. In the active phase, the function of these ectoderm-derived cells decreases, resulting in a decrease of insulin in the blood stream and an increase in the blood sugar level (hyperglycaemia). Conventional medicine defines this 'functional' - and not anatomical - deficit of Langerhans beta cells as a 'disease equivalent to cancer'.
In order to understand the biological conflict, it is very useful to go back to the etymological meaning of the term 'diabetes', i.e. 'going through'. It is triggered when the emotional perception is one of opposition or strong resistance with fear to a situation through which one 'does not want to pass'. Again, it is easy to activate the beta-cell foci of Langerhans' when important decisions have to be made and one is afraid of the consequences. An example of this are those argumentative children to whom nothing goes right, always in opposition with parents, friends, teachers, etc. Individuals who do not want to let anyone step on their toes, but who generally see obstacles where none exist, just out of the sheer need to oppose something.
In order to find exit strategies from situations that are deemed not traversable, the brain requires more glucose. Unlike all other tissues in the body, in fact, the brain does not need an instrument - in this case insulin - to acquire nourishment. The biological sense, therefore, lies precisely in inhibiting the ability of the various organs to absorb glucose and allowing the brain to keep it 'all to itself'. For this reason, too, diabetics tend to be very 'cerebral'. They think a lot, apply strategies to find solutions to problems that do not exist.
In the opposite hemisphere, on the other hand, we find, symmetrically, the area that regulates the production of glucagon, another polypeptide hormone that has the function of producing glucose via the liver and thus raising the blood glucose level. It is produced by Langerhans alpha cells and together with insulin maintains stable and balanced blood glucose levels. This focus is activated by an emotional resentment of fear, revulsion or repulsion, most frequently in the face of unpleasant situations in the sexual sphere. Glucagon production is inhibited and therefore the individual feels the need to feed continuously, as glucose levels are very low.
DIABETIC CONSTELLATION
There is also a so-called 'diabetic' constellation that occurs with the activation of both foci of the islets of Langerhans, beta and alpha, as they are affected by the hormonal aspect, so much so that they refer to conflicts that can be identified as 'masculine' or 'feminine'. This is the case with what conventional medicine refers to as 'intermittent labile diabate'.
The activation of both brain areas relating respectively to the function of the alpha- and beta-cells of Langerhans' makes a continuous alternation between hypo- and hyperglycaemia possible, depending on the oscillation of the hormonal balance between one and the other hemisphere. Generally speaking, the levels in schizophrenic constellations remain more or less stable and it is good to keep an eye on the resolution phase of one of the two conflicts, as the subject can immediately become hypo- or hyperglycaemic depending on which conflict is resolved first. The typical behaviours of all subjects in this constellation are revulsion, repulsion and opposition to everything. Bianchi and Pellegrino, in their book 'Il Viaggio Impossibile', liken this behaviour to the reaction of animals to stand up to keep the enemy away.
Deaf anger fuels irritability, even over a trivial trifle, and is accompanied by the paranoid traits typical of cortical constellations. If the conflict in the left hemisphere is more pronounced, there are unbearable and uncontrollable hunger attacks, very often the cause of further eating disorders. An example of this is the so-called Binge Eating, i.e. the intake of a large amount of food in a relatively short period of time.
With regard to the differentiation between type 1 and type 2 diabetes, Dr Matteo Penzo proposes an alternative view. Type 1 finds in its biological sense the desire to prevent an intention ('active' resistance), while in type 2 we find the prevention of an action ('passive' resistance). I quote below from the course documents in Human Biology at the Scuola del Sintomo Daleth:
Type 1: to prevent a (deadly) intention, sugar must not enter the muscles. You don't have to obey an order that can ruin your vit. To do this I have to prevent the sugar from entering the muscles, so it stays in the bloodstream to allow the brain (which it can enter even without insulin) to find a solution. Sugar binary whenever you find yourself obeying an order unwillingly: you are only OK if you disobey!!! (typical of rebellious people). Situations that put you in a corner or precise words ('you must') activate the binaries! Affective addictions that remain in the intention: like an athlete who remains at the starting blocks, loaded with sugar, but in suspense, he remains waiting! The 'pack leader can lead me to death', so I don't follow him, I disobey.
Type 2: You don't need to increase blood sugar to increase the glucose resistance of your muscles. So what can be the point of glucose resistance? It is a passive resistance conflict. I don't have to move my muscles. I don't want to be moved. I want to be a dead weight (frequent association with being overweight). Without affectivity we are dead. Death is equivalent to cold. Cold in the animal world increases blood sugar. In the diabetic this connection with cold is present. I want to increase the warmth in my Life/Family because the perceived is that of coldness, there is a lack of 'sweetness' in my life.
YOU ARE DIABETIC!
To date, conventional medicine's suggestions for the treatment of diabetes are based on an increased focus on nutrition and iatrogenic insulin intake. There is often a tendency to blame foods such as pasta, sweets and bread, as they are rich in carbohydrates. Foods rich in simple sugars or fructose are discouraged, as they can lead to increased triglycerides in the blood.
In a nutshell, the diabetic subject is constantly kept under a constant net of advice and/or obligations that, with the passage of time, consolidate the idea of being in a condition of energy deficit and perpetual alarm. Not to mention, among other things, the fact that it is christened a 'chronic disease', thus instilling in the patient's mind the idea that once diagnosed, it is no longer possible to get out of it. A lethal vicious circle that keeps the subject inside a deadly yoke.
The diabetic acts with the thought of not being able to move without insulin on him, exacerbating the idea of being dependent on it every moment of his daily life. Just imagine if doctors tried to put into practice the suggestions that the five biological laws make available to us, free of charge by the way. As I have said countless times now, the New Medicine must not replace models that are already in place. A diabetic patient with an insulin deficiency risks very serious problems, so it is not my intention to imply that he should give up treatment.
However, a few questions about the patient's private life or certain behaviours that can lead to continued relapses in the brain can potentially help the patient to become aware of the fact that diabetes, like all the topics addressed in this column, is nothing more than a perfectly sensible biological programme.
A doctor has enormous power, as it is the patient himself who gives him this power for social/anthropological reasons. Think of what it might mean if a doctor could confront a diabetic subject with the knowledge that at the basis of the disease there is a biological conflict that has triggered a series of processes on the three levels psyche - brain - organ.
It may not immediately solve the problem, also because the resolution depends solely and uniquely on the subject, but it can certainly help him or her remove the fear of the disease. The primary goal for which the five biological laws exist and for which Dr Hamer has invested a large part of his life.
Man's greatest enemy is fear, which appears in such diverse forms as shame, jealousy, anger, insolence, arrogance...What is the cause of fear? Lack of self-confidence.
Svami Prajnanapada